Future of the OPM. Four Scenarios Later.

Hundreds of industry experts assessed the likelihood and expressed their preferences about the future of the OPM model.

Education Intelligence Unit

calendar image
March 13, 2019

Most respondents (36%) would prefer to see 'OPM Unbundling' unfold. But you need to dig deeper to get the full story.

More coverage on the future of the OPM model has been published over the last month since we shared our Anatomy of an OPM report than we have seen over the last few years. We asked for your views on the four scenarios for the future of OPMs and 230+ folks around the world shared their perspective.

4 OPM Scenarios in 2030

Emerging trends providing directional signals about the future shape of the OPM Market, which have been shaped into 4 OPM Scenarios for 2030 based on two of the most discussed OPM dimensions.

Outsource-Insource – Will Universities embrace the OPM and continue to ‘outsource’ the capabilities and resources OPMs offer, or will they seek to build those capabilities in-house and manage the entire online spectrum over the long-run?

Consolidation-Fragmentation – Will online higher education consolidate towards an oligopoly of global giants, akin to the broader technology sector or are we more likely see a highly disbursed and fragmented market of ‘suppliers’ that represent vendor relationships more than partnerships?

HolonIQ OPM Scenarios

Expect Universities to Outsource Online Degrees

230+ education experts, executives, entrepreneurs and investors around the world assessed the probability of each of the future OPM scenarios would be realized by 2030. The assessment was independent of their personal preference and on a case by case basis (i.e. assess each scenario independently rather than distributing 100% between the four).

Follow each axis, most respondents identified that outsourcing is more likely to occur than university ‘insourcing’. Opinion is divided on the likelihood of consolidation or fragmentation of the market, with both OPM ‘Oligopoly’ and OPM ‘Unbundling’ identified as probable, with a slightly higher preference to consolidation than fragmentation. University Network and University DIY scenarios also followed similar patterns. Of the ‘insource’ quadrant options, the DIY (Do It Yourself) scenario was identified as a higher probability than a University Network scenario but not by much. Both, however, received “Probably Not” as the most popular response.

HolonIQ OPM Scenarios - Employer Pref

Universities favor Unbundling. Investors expect it too.

Over two-thirds of responses from those who work in universities expect that the outsourcing models will dominate, with 40% favouring the OPM Unbundling scenario where universities maintain control over the value chain and work with a number of OPM’s on a fee for service basis. Investor respondents agree and 60% expect the OPM market of 2030 to be competitive, fragmented and active.

Interestingly, OPM Providers themselves see an OPM Oligopoly scenario more preferable, identifying that the market will consolidate around a few large players, rather than fragment with many small providers. 60% of respondents who identified as investors chose OPM Oligopoly as their most preferred scenario in 2030.

HolonIQ OPM Scenarios

Global Respondents. Industry cross-section

Almost half of all respondents were from the Americas, with most in this group from the USA. Europe accounted for approximately one quarter, Oceania and Asia around 10% each and 5% from Africa.

Those working in universities accounted for around one third of respondents, OPM providers and general industry folk around 20% each, with technology providers and investors making up the remainder of the group.

Do you operate in or with the higher education sector and have experience with online program development or delivery models? Share your thoughts on future OPM Scenarios.

Vote for the 4 OPM Scenarios

HolonIQ OPM Respondents

Ready to get started?

Get a personalized walkthrough of our platform.

arrow right

Where is this data coming from?

HolonIQ is the world's leading impact intelligence platform. We support governments, institutions, firms and investors, with data insights to power decisions that matter. If you are not already a client, request a demo to learn more about our platform.

arrow right

Latest Insights

Description

2021
2021
2020
2020
Sub Saharan Africa
Sub Saharan Africa
Nordic Baltic
Nordic Baltic
North America
North America
South Asia
South Asia
East Asia
East Asia
ANZ
ANZ
Market Sizing
Market Sizing
Augmented Reality
Augmented Reality
Blockchain
Blockchain
Virtual Reality
Virtual Reality
Regions
Regions
Markets
Markets
Mobile
Mobile
Client Report
Client Report
Publishers
Publishers
Labor Markets
Labor Markets
Global Landscape
Global Landscape
10 Charts Series
10 Charts Series
R&D
R&D
LMS
LMS
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Executive Panel
Executive Panel
Language Learning
Language Learning
Russia
Russia
Israel
Israel
Germany
Germany
France
France
Media and Press
Media and Press
Climate Tech
Climate Tech
MENA
MENA
South Korea
South Korea
Japan
Japan
Southeast Asia
Southeast Asia
Digital Health
Digital Health
Global EdTech 1000
Global EdTech 1000
Unicorns
Unicorns
MOOCs
MOOCs
Global Giants
Global Giants
Client Note
Client Note
Capital Markets
Capital Markets
Advanced Technology
Advanced Technology
OPM
OPM
International Education
International Education
India
India
China
China
Canada
Canada
Venture Capital
Venture Capital
Bootcamps
Bootcamps
Online learning
Online learning
Notes
Notes
Europe
Europe
Asia
Asia
Africa
Africa
LATAM
LATAM
Brazil
Brazil
Robotics
Robotics
Education in 2030
Education in 2030
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence
SDG 17
SDG 17
SDG 16
SDG 16
SDG 15
SDG 15
SDG 14
SDG 14
SDG 13
SDG 13
SDG 12
SDG 12
SDG 11
SDG 11
SDG 10
SDG 10
SDG 9
SDG 9
SDG 8
SDG 8
SDG 7
SDG 7
SDG 6
SDG 6
SDG 5
SDG 5
SDG 4
SDG 4
SDG 3
SDG 3
SDG 2
SDG 2
SDG 1
SDG 1
Climate Tech 1000
Climate Tech 1000
Digital Health 1000
Digital Health 1000
EdTech 1000
EdTech 1000
EdTech
EdTech
Diversity
Diversity
New Zealand
New Zealand
Australia
Australia
United States
United States
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Environment
Environment
Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Energy
Energy
Climate
Climate
Workforce
Workforce
K12
K12
Higher Education
Higher Education
Education
Education
Early Childhood
Early Childhood
Health
Health